#Callaway x hot driver 2019 review drivers
#Callaway x hot driver 2019 review series

UST Mamiya Helium Black 4 Graphite shaft.

Project X EvenFlow Riptide 60 Graphite shaft.

Project X EvenFlow Riptide 50 Graphite shaft.

Aldila Rogue White 130 MSI 70 Graphite shaft.

Aldila Rogue White 130 MSI 60 Graphite shaft.

While all 3 versions feature Jailbreak bars and SS20 Flash faces, the Max and Sub Zero are the only ones with interchangeable weights. The standard Mavrik is the only one with the elongated вЂњCyclone AeroвЂќ head shape. The standard Mavrik was released alongside the Mavrik Max and Mavrik Sub Zero.

#Callaway x hot driver 2019 review drivers

When you swing these 2 drivers side by side, you can also tell that the XR driver has a lower CG than the X Hot, hits the ball further and justifies the extra price. With the XR, you get an 8-point adjustable hosel, a crown with a leading edge and a lighter, thinner face.

The XR driver is essentially a more advanced version of the X Hot. The Mavrik also has a different, more elongated and aero dynamic head shape than the X Hot driver.

#Callaway x hot driver 2019 review series

The list of differences between the Callaway Mavrik and the X Hot drivers is longer.Д¬allaway stepped away from VFT for the Mavrik series вЂ“ opting instead for titanium Flash Face which, is thinner, lighter and more resilient. The main similarity is that they both feature an adjustable hosel that allows you to tweak loft and lie. The Mavrik has come a long way from the X Hot driver so there are very few spec similarities. The result is straighter shots across the expanse of the face. The face is thinner around the perimeter and thicker in the center or sweet spot. The Callaway X Hot driver features one of the earliest iteration of Variable Face Thickness. The Mavrik also features Jailbreak bars to stabilize the incredibly thin, hot face. helped Callaway sort through millions of drive scenarios to come up with the face architecture to accommodate more varying situations. The Mavrik features FS2S titanium which is 6 grams lighter than normal titanium.ДЄ.I. There is always some overlap вЂ“ they are both Callaway drivers after all.Д«ut the Mavrik obviously has more modern features while the X Hot driver takes a more analog approach to ball speed. Where these 2 drivers diverge from each other is how they produce ball speed. Right off the bat, the central thesis behind both of these drivers is the same: produce more ball speed for longer drives. But do you need to spend a lot on a newer model?Дo older models perform just as well in 2021? To answer this question we are going to pit a modern Callaway driver against one of yesteryear to see how they compare. Stressful because it can be hard to determine how much you need to spend.Д¬allaway drivers are known for performance вЂ“ thatвЂ™s a given. Having cause to be in the market for a new driver can be an exciting and stressful situation.Д®xciting because you know youвЂ™re going to get your hands on a new driver. Callaway Mavrik Vs Callaway X Hot Driver Review & Comparison